According to the article, she believes he refused a feeding tube which would have only delayed the death process. There is nothing wrong with dying with dignity, if the person accepts their condition and decides that it is time, every means possible to keep them alive just isn’t necessary anymore. This looks like a catchy title to draw attention, in that situation, when someone personally refuses treatment, it’s not euthanasia.
But didn't he HAVE a feeding tube? And isn't food just a basic need for EVERYONE? No one should STARVE to death---Ooooh this is a touchy subject after Teri Shiavo....
4 comments:
OH MY GOSH!!! What in the WORLD?! What do you think about this article?
According to the article, she believes he refused a feeding tube which would have only delayed the death process. There is nothing wrong with dying with dignity, if the person accepts their condition and decides that it is time, every means possible to keep them alive just isn’t necessary anymore. This looks like a catchy title to draw attention, in that situation, when someone personally refuses treatment, it’s not euthanasia.
But didn't he HAVE a feeding tube? And isn't food just a basic need for EVERYONE? No one should STARVE to death---Ooooh this is a touchy subject after Teri Shiavo....
What is it with popes named John Paul and daffy conspiracy theories surrounding their deaths?
Post a Comment